Governing Artificial Intelligence In the Digital Commons: A Normative Legal Framework for Education and Cultural Preservation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56861/nalarnagara.v1i3.114Keywords:
Digital Commons Normative, Legal Framework, Algorithmic Accountability, Cultural Preservation, Digital Commons, Kerangka Hukum Normatif, Akuntabilitas Algoritmik, Pelestarian BudayaAbstract
The growing integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into education systems and cultural institutions is transforming the digital commons by reshaping how knowledge is produced, accessed, and preserved. Despite rapid technological adoption, existing legal frameworks remain fragmented and insufficient to address the structural implications of AI as a governance infrastructure within shared knowledge ecosystems. This study examines the normative legal foundations required to regulate AI in education and cultural preservation.
Using a normative legal and governance-based analytical approach grounded in public law theory and regulatory governance models, the analysis finds that three structural challenges undermine current regulatory responses: the concentration of algorithmic authority within private actors, asymmetrical data representation affecting cultural diversity, and the absence of enforceable accountability standards in AI-mediated knowledge systems. These gaps risk weakening epistemic equity and the public character of education and cultural heritage.
The study concludes that the digital commons can serve as a coherent normative legal framework for AI governance. It proposes a structured model integrating risk-based regulation, enforceable transparency obligations, and public-interest oversight mechanisms to safeguard inclusive education and cultural sustainability. This framework provides a principled legal foundation for governing AI in shared knowledge infrastructures.
References
Floridi, Luciano, et al. “AI4People—An Ethical Framework for a Good AI Society: Opportunities, Risks, Principles, and Recommendations.” Minds and Machines 28, no. 4 (2018): 689–707. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-018-9482-5.
European Commission. Ethics Guidelines for Trustworthy AI. Brussels: European Commission, 2019. https://doi.org/10.2759/346720.
UNESCO. Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence. Paris: UNESCO, 2021. https://doi.org/10.54677/MNMH8546.
Mittelstadt, Brent D., et al. “The Ethics of Algorithms: Mapping the Debate.” Big Data & Society 3, no. 2 (2016): 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716679679.
Lessig, Lawrence. Code and Other Laws of Cyberspace. New York: Basic Books, 1999.
Benkler, Yochai. The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2006.
Pasquale, Frank. The Black Box Society: The Secret Algorithms That Control Money and Information. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2015.
Crawford, Kate. Atlas of AI: Power, Politics, and the Planetary Costs of Artificial Intelligence. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2021.
Zuboff, Shoshana. The Age of Surveillance Capitalism. New York: PublicAffairs, 2019.
OECD. OECD Principles on Artificial Intelligence. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1787/eadf8b0d-en.
World Economic Forum. Global Technology Governance Report 2021. Geneva: World Economic Forum, 2021.
Kwet, Michael. “Digital Colonialism: US Empire and the New Imperialism in the Global South.” Race & Class 60, no. 4 (2019): 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306396818823172.
Selwyn, Neil. Education and Technology: Key Issues and Debates. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2016.
Eubanks, Virginia. Automating Inequality: How High-Tech Tools Profile, Police, and Punish the Poor. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 2018.
Morozov, Evgeny. To Save Everything, Click Here: The Folly of Technological Solutionism. New York: PublicAffairs, 2013.
Downloads
Submitted
Accepted
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Anwar Sadat, Farhana Farhana, Hamdan Azhar Siregar, Otom Mustami

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.






