LEGAL PROTECTION OF CUSTODY AND CHILD SUPPORT FOR CHILDREN WITH SPECIAL NEEDS AS A RESULT OF DIVORCE (Study of the Decision of The Yogyakarta District Court No. 156/PDT.G/2022/PN.YYK)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56861/nalarnagara.v1i1.46Keywords:
child protection, children with special needs, custody, and child support.Abstract
Divorce often has a profound impact on children, especially those with special needs. In this case, the role of the law is vital to ensure that children's rights remain fully protected. The issue in this study is the determination of custody and child support for Children with Special Needs in Decision No. 156/Pdt.G/2022/PN.Yyk is in accordance with the principles of child protection as stipulated in Law No. 35 of 2014 concerning Child Protection, and regarding the form of legal protection for children with special needs in divorce cases, as in the Yogyakarta District Court Decision No. 156/Pdt.G/2022/PN.Yyk. This study uses a normative method with a case approach and a legislative approach using literature study to obtain secondary data sourced from primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The data obtained is analyzed qualitatively. The study results show the decision in case No. 156/Pdt.G/2022/PN.Yyk is in accordance with the principle of child protection, especially for children with special needs. The judge granted custody to the mother and awarded lifelong alimony, per the child's best interests’ principle. However, its implementation still requires supervision to effectively protect the child's rights.Implementing legal protection for Children with Special Needs in Decision No. 156/Pdt.G/2022/PN.Yyk was realized through granting custody to the mother and lifetime alimony from the father. This decision reflects substantive justice and the best interests of the child in accordance with the Child Protection Law and the Disability Law.
References
Ade, Z. R. (2021). Permohonan Hak Asuh Anak Dalam Kasus Perceraian. https://doi.org/https://repository.unissula.ac.id/24675/1/30301509351_fullpdf.pdf
ALI, A. (2017). Menguak Teori Hukum (Legal Theory) Dan Teori Peradilan (Judicialprudence) (cetakan ke7). Kencana. https://doi.org/https:// books.google.co.id/books?id=NBZNDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA112& source=gbs_toc_r&cad=2#v=onepage&q&f=true
Anwar, S., Tinggi, S., Islam, A., Kamal, A., & Rembang, S. (2021). Hak Dan Kewajiban Pasutri Menurut UNDANG-UNDANG No 1 Tahun 1974: -. Al Kamal, 1(1).
Arizal Sastra Tjandi, A., Kasim, A., & Heridah, A. (2022). Kedudukan Hak Asuh Anak Akibat Cerai Hidup. Jurnal Litigasi Amsir, 10.
Devy, S., & Muliadi, D. (2020). Pertimbangan Hakim dalam Menetapkan Nafkah Anak Pasca Perceraian (Studi Putusan Hakim No 0233/Pdt.G/2017/MS-MBO). El-USRAH: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.22373/ujhk.v2i1.7646
Elizabeth, V., & Adhari, A. (2024). Kepastian Hukum Akibat Kelalaian Jaksa Penuntut Umum. Jurisprudensi: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, PerUndang-Undangan Dan Ekonomi Islam, 16(1), 99–114. https://doi.org/10.32505/jurisprudensi.v16i1.5735
Haga Elizabeth, V., & Adhari, A. (2024). Kepastian Hukum Akibat Kelalaian Jaksa Penuntut Umum. Jurisprudensi: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, PerUndang-Undangan Dan Ekonomi Islam, 16(1), 99–114. https://doi.org/10.32505/jurisprudensi.v16i1.5735
I Ketut Suardita, SH. M. (2017). Pengenalan Bahan Hukum (PBH). In Hukum Administrasi Negara Bagi Mahasiswa Semester I Fakultas Hukum Universitas Udayana.
Jonaedi, E., & Rijadi, P. (2016). Metode Penelitian Hukum Normatif Dan Empiris (Edisi Kedua). In Kencana (Issue Hukum). https://doi.org/https://books.google.co.id/books?id=5OZeDwAAQBAJ&lpg=PP1&pg= PP1#v=onepage&q&f=true
Khair, U. (2020). Pelaksanaan Hak Asuh Anak Sesudah Terjadinya Perceraian. JCH (Jurnal Cendekia Hukum), 5(2). https://doi.org/10.33760/jch.v5i2.231
Khair, U. (2020). Pelaksanaan Hak Asuh Anak Sesudah Terjadinya Perceraian. JCH (Jurnal Cendekia Hukum), 5(2). https://doi.org/10.33760/jch.v5i2.231
Muhaimin. (2020). Metode Penelitian Hukum. https://doi.org/https://eprints.unram.ac.id/20305/1/Metode%20Penelitian%20Hukum. Pdf
Muhamad Nur Rifaldi Rachman, Nirwan Junus, Nirwan Junus, & Julius T. Mandjo. (2023). Akibat Hukum Tidak Terlaksananya Hak Asuh Anak Pasca Perceraian Ayah dan ibu Di Pengadilan Agama Gorontalo. Mandub : Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum Dan Humaniora, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.59059/mandub.v2i1.884
Muhamad Nur Rifaldi Rachman, Nirwan Junus, & Julius T. Mandjo. (2023). Akibat Hukum Tidak Terlaksananya Hak Asuh Anak Pasca Perceraian Ayah dan ibu Di Pengadilan Agama Gorontalo. Mandub : Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum Dan Humaniora, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.59059/mandub.v2i1.884
Nurvia, I. (2023). Ummah Menurut Penafsiran sayyid Quthb Dalam tafsir Fi Zilalil Quran Dan Perbandingannya Dengan Civil Society. Skripsi.
Nurvia, I. (2023). Ummah Menurut Penafsiran sayyid Quthb Dalam tafsir Fi Zilalil Quran Dan Perbandingannya Dengan Civil Society. Skripsi.
Sahrum M. (2022). Pengantar Metodologi Penelitian Hukum: Kajian Penelitian Normatif, Empiris, Penulisan Proposal, Laporan Skripsi dan Tesis. In Qiara Media (Vol. 5, Issue 3).
Sahrum M. (2022). Pengantar Metodologi Penelitian Hukum: Kajian Penelitian Normatif, Empiris, Penulisan Proposal, Laporan Skripsi dan Tesis. In Qiara Media (Vol. 5, Issue 3).
Syaifuddin, M., Turatmiyah, S., & Yahanan, A. (2022). Hukum Perceraian (D. Chrismansyah, Ed.). Sinar Grafika Offset. https://doi.org/https://books.google.co.id/books?id=Y3GCEAAAQBAJ&pg=PA116& source=gbs_selected_pages&cad=1#v=onepage&q&f=false.org/10.23887/jmpppkn. v 2i1.135
Waluyo, B. (2020). Sahnya Pernikahan Menurut UNDANG-UNDANG No 1 Tahun 1974 Tentang Pernikahan. Jurnal Media Komunikasi Pendidikan Pancasila Dan Kewarganegaraan, 2(1).
Waluyo, B. (2020). Sahnya Pernikahan Menurut UNDANG-UNDANG No 1 Tahun 1974 Tentang Pernikahan. Jurnal Media Komunikasi Pendidikan Pancasila Dan Kewarganegaraan, 2(1).
196
Downloads
Submitted
Accepted
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Diki Permana Sakti, Sri Redjeki Slamet
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
